Carbon dioxide removal
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is defined as “Anthropogenic activities removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere and durably storing it in geological, terrestrial, or ocean reservoirs, or in products. It includes existing and potential anthropogenic enhancement of biological or geochemical CO2 sinks and direct air carbon dioxide capture and storage (DACCS), but excludes natural CO2 uptake not directly caused by human activities.”
Source: IPCC (2021) AR6 WGI Annex VII, Glossary, pg. 2221
Hard-to-abate activities in sectors such as agriculture and heavy industry mean that we need at least some CDR to reach net zero emissions.
“All available studies require at least some kind of carbon dioxide removal to reach net zero; that is, there are no studies where absolute zero GHG or even CO2 emissions are reached by deep emissions reductions alone.”
Source: IPCC (2022) AR6 WGIII Chapter 3, FAQ 3.2, pg. 385
“Most modelled pathways that likely limit warming to 2°C (>67%) above pre-industrial levels and below use land-based CO2 removal such as afforestation/reforestation and BECCS to achieve net zero CO2 and net zero GHG emissions even while some CO2 and non-CO2 emissions continue to occur. Pathways with more demand-side interventions that limit the amount of energy we use, or where the diet that we consume is changed, can achieve net zero CO2, or net zero GHG emissions with less carbon dioxide removal (CDR).”
Source: IPCC (2022) AR6 WGIII Chapter 3, FAQ 3.2, pg. 385
“Deliberate carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from the atmosphere has the potential to compensate for residual CO2 emissions to reach net zero CO2 emissions or to generate net negative CO2 emissions. In the same way that part of current anthropogenic net CO2 emissions are taken up by land and ocean carbon stores, net CO2 removal will be partially counteracted by CO2 release from these stores (very high confidence). Asymmetry in the carbon cycle response to simultaneous CO2 emissions and removals implies that a larger amount of CO2 would need to be removed to compensate for an emission of a given magnitude to attain the same change in atmospheric CO2 (medium confidence). CDR methods have wide-ranging side-effects that can either weaken or strengthen the carbon sequestration and cooling potential of these methods and affect the achievement of sustainable development goals (high confidence).”
Source: IPCC (2021) AR6 WGI TS.3.3.2, pg. 99
Carbon dioxide removal taxonomy

Source: IPCC (2022) AR6 WGIII Chapter 12, Cross-Chapter Box 8, Figure 1, pg. 1262
Characteristics of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods



Source: IPCC (2021) AR6 WGI Chapter 5, Table 5.9
Carbon sink response in a scenario with net carbon dioxide (CO2) removal from the atmosphere

Source: IPCC (2021) AR6 WGI TS, Figure TS.19, pg. 100
Evidence on carbon dioxide removal (CDR) abatement costs, 2050 deployment potentials, and key side effects

Source: IPCC (2018) SR15 Chapter 4, Figure 4.2, pg. 344
Summary of status, costs, potentials, risk and impacts, co-benefits, trade-offs and spillover effects and the role in mitigation pathways for CDR methods

Source: IPCC (2022) AR6 WGIII Chapter 12, Table 12.6, pg. 1275
Characteristics of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods, ordered according to the time scale of carbon storage

Source: IPCC (2021) AR6 WGI Chapter 5, Figure 5.36
Schematic representation of carbon fluxes between atmosphere, land, ocean and geological reservoirs

Source: IPCC (2021) AR6 WGI Chapter 5, Box 5.3, Figure 1
Sources for this post:
- IPCC (2018) Special Report: Global Warming of 1.5 ºC, Chapter 4, Strengthening and Implementing the Global Response
- IPCC (2021) AR6 WGI, Technical Summary
- IPCC (2021) AR6 WGI, Chapter 5, Global Carbon and other Biogeochemical Cycles and Feedbacks
- IPCC (2021) AR6 WGI, Annex VII, Glossary (pdf)
- IPCC (2022) AR6 WGIII, Chapter 3, Mitigation pathways compatible with long-term goals
- IPCC (2022) AR6 WGIII, Chapter 12, Cross sectoral perspectives
Featured image: IPCC (2021) AR6 WGI Chapter 5, Box 5.3, Figure 1 (modified)